We use a Cisco PIX as a firewall. The PIX is outside of the switches. All
users pass through the PIX to get to the Internet. The PIX also supports
VPN. We have disabled all ports that are not needed for HTTP, FTP, VPN or
SMTP. We have a static IP address and the PIX handles the translations, but
I still lie awake at nights worried about security.
I wouldn't scrimp on the router. It is the only thing between you and the
baddies.
"Keith W. McCammon" <km DeleteThis @km.com> wrote in message
news:OgnzfdYmDHA.3688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > 1. To bay a DSL/VPN router (Linksys for example), connect it to the
switch
> > and configure it to complete the task.
> >
> > 2. To connect the server to Internet with a new NIC. Then, configure the
> > server to accept incoming VPN connections and make it an internet
gateway
> > for the users on the office network.
> >
> > The question is which way is better and secure, and why?
>
> There's really no good way to answer that. It all depends on host
security,
> configuration, services, etc. In general, I would suggest using a cheap
> router that has inbound tunnel support, use that as a cheap-o firewall,
and
> use RRAS.
>
> Note that this is a very sub-optimal way to do this, and you need to read
> and understand the security implications and responsibilities related to
> your operating system in order to make this stable and effective.
>
> >> Stay informed about: Network security